The following lists palliative care research primarily conducted by Australian research groups. The list is based on application of the CareSearch search filter for palliative care to identify articles held within the PubMed database and corresponding to the strongest evidence. Articles have been selected based on relevance and new articles are added on a weekly basis.
Whilst not an exhaustive list, the aim is to keep the community informed by providing a snapshot of recent research findings and planned studies in the Australian setting.
Symons X, Rhee J, Tanous A, Balboni T, VanderWeele TJ.
Abstract: Flourishing is an increasingly common construct employed in the study of human wellbeing. But its appropriateness as a framework of wellbeing at certain stages of life is contested. In this paper, we consider to what extent it is possible for someone to flourish at the end of life. People with terminal illness often experience significant and protracted pain and suffering especially when they opt for treatments that prolong life. Certain aspects of human goods, however, that are plausibly constitutive of flourishing-such as meaning and purpose, deep personal relationships, and character and virtue-can be uniquely realised when life is ending. We argue that there is a qualified sense in which one can flourish at the end of life but that one must make important modifications to the criteria implicit in conventional conceptions of flourishing. We close with a discussion of the empirical assessment of wellbeing at the end of life and explore the possibility of introducing a flourishing measure in palliative care practice.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Chan KY, Chang SR.
No Abstract.
Abasseri M, Hoque S, Caldwell K, Sheahan L, Kochovska S, Agar M, et al.
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma is a burdensome form of liver cancer with an increasing global prevalence. Emerging evidence has shown that early palliative care introduction at diagnosis of any life-limiting illness improves patient and carer outcomes. Despite this, patients with hepatocellular carcinoma usually receive palliative care late. These patients are important stakeholders in the provision of palliative care, but their perceived barriers regarding its delivery are poorly defined.
Aim: This pilot study aimed to identify the barriers perceived by patients to integrating palliative care into the hepatocellular carcinoma treatment algorithm.
Design: Patients living with hepatocellular carcinoma undertook semi-structured interviews about their perceptions of palliative care. We compared these perceptions before and after providing a brief explanation of palliative care. Interview data was inductively coded in NVivo 12 (2018) and thematically analysed.
Results: Twenty-one patients were interviewed. 16 perceived palliative care to mean end-of-life therapy, and nine participants had no prior knowledge of palliative care. After hearing a definition of palliative care, 17 participants reported changed positive attitudes. Seven participants supported a name change, including four participants who continued to reject palliative care following the explanation due to the negative stigma associated with the term 'palliative care'.
Conclusion: There is significant misperception about the purpose of palliative care among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, constituting a barrier to early integration. This can be feasibly addressed with a two-folded educational and renaming initiative to dispel patient misconceptions regarding palliative care. Effective strategies to achieve this should be developed and tested with relevant stakeholders, particularly patients.
Hudson P, Francis J, Cohen J, Kapp S, De Abreu Lourenco R, Beatty L, et al.
Background: Advanced cancer significantly impacts patients’ and family caregivers’ quality of life. When patients and caregivers are supported concurrently as a dyad, the well-being of each person is optimized. Family, Outlook, Communication, Uncertainty, Symptom management (FOCUS) is a dyadic, psychoeducational intervention developed in the United States, shown to improve the well-being and quality of life of patients with advanced cancer and their primary caregivers. Originally, a nurse-delivered in-person intervention, FOCUS has been adapted into a self-administered web-based intervention for European delivery.
Objective: The aims of this study are to (1) adapt FOCUS to the Australian context (FOCUSau); (2) evaluate the effectiveness of FOCUSau in improving the emotional well-being and self-efficacy of patients with advanced cancer and their primary caregiver relative to usual care control group; (3) compare health care use between the intervention and control groups; and (4) assess the acceptability, feasibility, and scalability of FOCUSau in order to inform future maintainable implementation of the intervention within the Australian health care system.
Methods: FOCUS will be adapted prior to trial commencement, using an iterative stakeholder feedback process to create FOCUSau. To examine the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of FOCUSau and assess its acceptability, feasibility, and scalability, we will undertake a hybrid type 1 implementation study consisting of a phase 3 (clinical effectiveness) trial along with an observational implementation study. Participants will include patients with cancer who are older than 18 years, able to access the internet, and able to identify a primary support person or caregiver who can also be approached for participation. The sample size consists of 173 dyads in each arm (ie, 346 dyads in total). Patient-caregiver dyad data will be collected at 3 time points—baseline (T0) completed prerandomization; first follow-up (T1; N=346) at 12 weeks post baseline; and second follow-up (T2) at 24 weeks post baseline.
Results: The study was funded in March 2022. Recruitment commenced in July 2024.
Conclusions: If shown to be effective, this intervention will improve the well-being of patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers, regardless of their location or current level of health care support.
Laabar TD, Saunders C, Auret K, Johnson CE.
Background: The need for palliative care is ever-increasing globally. However, it is least developed or not available in most low-and-middle-income-countries including Bhutan.
Objective: This study was aimed at exploring the perspectives of Bhutanese healthcare professionals on the need for palliative care in the country.
Design: This is a cross-sectional, mixed-method study.
Setting/subjects: The study sites included all levels of healthcare in Bhutan and involved doctors, nurses, physiotherapists, pharmacists, health assistants and Drungtshos (traditional physicians). Data were collected through surveys, focus group discussions and in-depth interviews.
Results: While the majority of the participants were directly involved in taking care of terminally ill and dying patients, only 14% had received some form of palliative care training for a duration ranging from 1 day to 6 weeks. Ninety-five percent of the participants reported that they faced challenges related to lack of palliative care knowledge and skills; limited resources including analgesics; shortage of doctors and nurses and lack of a palliative care team; issues with low illiteracy and financial challenges among patients; and policies and other systemic issues. The qualitative data generated four major themes: past adverse experiences; unique and complex needs for palliative care; challenges faced while caring for terminally ill and dying patients; and the urgent need for palliative care in Bhutan.
Conclusion: Bhutanese healthcare professionals had very limited exposure to palliative care. This study identified a crucial need for palliative care and informs the development of an appropriate palliative care model for Bhutan. © The Author(s), 2024.
Last updated 30 April 2024