Key messages

  • Prognostication in palliative care involves predicting the disease course and estimating time remaining for patients nearing end of life. Prognostication tools such as the Surprise Question, Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool, Palliative Performance Scale and Palliative Prognostic Index are critical for identifying patients needing palliative care.
  • Palliative care needs assessment identifies the physical, emotional, social, and spiritual needs of patients with life-limiting illnesses.
  • Deprescribing involves reducing or stopping unnecessary medications to enhance quality of life as patients near end of life.
  • Telemedicine can bridge gaps in palliative care access in rural areas, though its implementation must consider technological literacy and access.
  • Supporting families and carers involves addressing their emotional, social and practical needs, and providing resources like respite care and counselling.

Related evidence

Suggest a tool

Have a favourite clinical tool not listed here? Contact us.

Definition and prevalence

Prognostication in palliative care refers to the process of predicting the likely course and outcome of a disease, particularly in estimating the time remaining for patients nearing the end of life. [1,2] This includes the use of various tools and clinical judgements to guide treatment decisions and care planning. [2,3] Palliative care needs assessment focuses on identifying the physical, emotional, social and spiritual needs of patients with life-limiting illnesses to provide holistic, patient-centred care. [4,5]


Assessment

Prognostication tools in palliative care are important for identifying patients who may benefit from palliative interventions. [1,2] The Surprise Question (SQ), which asks clinicians if they would be surprised if a patient died within a specified period of time (usually 6-12 months), is a widely used tool that helps identify patients who need further assessment and palliative care. [1,6] Despite its simplicity, the accuracy of the SQ can vary between clinicians and especially among patients with complex conditions like frailty. [6,7]

The Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT) aids healthcare professionals in identifying patients with deteriorating health due to advanced conditions and unmet supportive care needs, promoting timely and comprehensive palliative care planning. [2,8] Similarly, the Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) measures a patient’s functional status, providing a score that helps in prognostication and planning appropriate interventions. [9,10]

Another important tool, the Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI), uses clinical variables such as performance status, oral intake and symptoms like dyspnoea and delirium to predict survival, aiding in informed decision-making about the timing and intensity of palliative care. [2,11] Palliative Care Needs Rounds, involving multidisciplinary discussions about patients with complex conditions, ensure comprehensive care by addressing all aspects of a patient’s needs. [12,13]

Question Prompt Lists (QPLs) are designed to encourage patients to ask questions about their prognosis, treatment options and care preferences. [14,15] QPLs can improve communication between patients and healthcare providers, ensuring that patients' concerns and preferences are addressed during consultations. [14,15] They are particularly useful in facilitating discussions about palliative care and end-of-life planning, helping patients to make informed decisions about their care. [14,15]

Comparatively, each tool has its strengths and limitations. The SQ is quick and easy to use but may lack precision in certain populations. [1,6] SPICT and PPS provide more detailed assessments but require more time and training to implement effectively. [8,9] The PPI is particularly useful for predicting survival but may not capture all dimensions of a patient’s condition. [2,11] Needs Rounds ensure holistic care but depend on the availability of a multidisciplinary team. [12,13] QPLs enhance patient engagement and ensure their preferences are central to care planning, but they rely on patients’ willingness to participate and ask questions. [14,15]

It is important to note, other assessment tools exist and can be selected based on the clinical setting and resources available.


Treatment

Palliative approaches to care should be present from the initial diagnosis of a life limiting illness. However, the focus should shift to palliative care when the goals of care need to change from prolonging life to enhancing quality of life. [16,17] This transition often includes deprescribing unnecessary medications that may no longer provide benefit and could cause harm as a patient nears the end of life. [16,17] It involves a careful evaluation of the patient's current medications, considering factors such as life expectancy, goals of care and potential side effects. [16,17] Deprescribing can be particularly important in managing symptoms and improving the quality of life for patients with multiple chronic conditions. [17,18] For example, patients with advanced cancer or end-stage organ failure often take multiple medications, some of which may no longer be necessary or may contribute to adverse effects. [1,2] By carefully evaluating and discontinuing such medications, healthcare providers can help reduce unnecessary drug interactions and side effects, enhancing patient comfort and well-being. [1,17]

Anticipatory prescribing refers to the practice of pre-emptively providing injectable medications to manage symptoms such as pain, nausea, dyspnoea and anxiety in patients approaching the end of life. [19] This approach ensures that medications are readily available for timely administration, thereby preventing symptom crises and reducing emergency hospital admissions. [19] When recognising the last months of life, anticipatory prescribing allows palliative care teams to develop comprehensive and individualised care plans that anticipate potential symptom exacerbations. [19] This proactive method enhances patient comfort and supports family carers by equipping them with the necessary tools and confidence to manage distressing symptoms at home. [19] Effective implementation of anticipatory prescribing requires standardised training from healthcare professionals, and efficient management of medication supply and storage, which collectively improve the quality of end-of-life care. [19]

Incorporating discussions about prognosis and advance care planning are essential for high quality palliative care. [20,21] Clear communication about the limitations of curative treatments and the benefits of palliative care helps patients and families make informed decisions. [20,22] For example, studies have shown that timely discussions about goals of care in advanced cancer can improve patient satisfaction and align treatment with patient preferences. [2,22]

The ethical considerations in transitioning from curative to palliative care are also significant. Providers must navigate the balance between offering hope and being realistic about outcomes, ensuring that patients and families understand the shift in focus without feeling abandoned. [23,24] The literature emphasises the importance of a compassionate approach, where the patient’s values and preferences are central to care decisions. [1,24]

    Equity and access

    Culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) populations often face significant barriers in recognising the last months of life and accessing appropriate palliative care. [25,26] Cultural differences, language barriers and distrust of the healthcare system are major obstacles. [25,26] Effective communication and culturally sensitive care are essential to addressing these disparities and ensuring equitable access to palliative care services. [5,27]

    In rural areas, geographic isolation and limited healthcare resources further exacerbate these challenges. [28,29] Telemedicine has emerged as a valuable tool to bridge the gap, providing remote consultations and continuous support to patients in rural settings, thus improving their access to palliative care. [28,29] However, the implementation of telemedicine must consider the technological literacy and access of rural populations to ensure its effectiveness. [26,28]

    For incarcerated individuals, the prison environment poses unique barriers to end-of-life care. [3,30] Ensuring that these individuals receive compassionate and appropriate palliative care requires tailored interventions that address the constraints of the prison setting and the specific needs of the population. [3,30]

    Socioeconomic status is another critical factor influencing access to palliative care. [5,26] Low socioeconomic status is associated with reduced access to healthcare services, limited availability of necessary resources and increased burden on families and carers. [5,26] Addressing these disparities requires policies and interventions that provide financial support, education and resources to underserved populations. [5,25]


    Care context

    Recognising the last months of life in aged care settings involves addressing the unique needs of older adults, including managing chronic illnesses, frailty and cognitive impairments. [7,14,24] Older adults often have multiple comorbidities, which complicates prognostication and requires a nuanced approach. [14,24] Effective communication, comprehensive care planning and multidisciplinary approaches are essential in providing palliative care in care homes.  [7,14,24] Clinical indicators such as sudden weight loss, frequent hospitalisations and declining functional status can help healthcare providers identify residents in their last months of life, enabling timely initiation of palliative care interventions. [24,31]

    Paediatric palliative care addresses the unique needs of children with life-limiting conditions and their families through specialised approaches. [12,32] Unlike adults, children often face longer illness trajectories due to conditions like congenital disorders and childhood cancers. [12] This care integrates symptom management, psychosocial support and family-centred care, ensuring comprehensive support throughout the illness. [12] Collaboration with paediatric specialists and a multidisciplinary team is essential to address pain, emotional and developmental needs when recognising the last months of life. [12] Early integration of palliative care improves quality of life, aids in complex medical decisions and provides emotional coping mechanisms. [12] Tailored communication, involving honest discussions about prognosis and care goals, builds trust and supports shared decision-making. [12] Educational resources and counselling empower families to make informed decisions that align with their values. [32] Recognising the impact on the entire family, paediatric palliative care includes family support, counselling and respite care. [32]

    Implications for families and carers

    Families and carers play a crucial role in providing support and care for patients in their last months of life. [14,32] Their involvement is essential in care planning, decision-making, and managing day-to-day care needs. [14,32] Effective communication and providing adequate information and resources are vital in helping families and carers understand the patient's condition, treatment options, and palliative care goals. [18,32]

    Supporting families and carers involves addressing their emotional, social, and practical needs. [18,32] Caregivers often experience significant stress and burden, impacting their well-being. [18,32] Providing access to respite care, counselling, and support groups can help alleviate caregiver stress and improve their capacity to care for their loved ones. [18,32] Recognising and supporting the needs of families and carers are essential components of comprehensive palliative care. [18,32]

    1. Chu C, Engels Y, Suh SY, Kim SH, White N. Should the surprise question be used as a prognostic tool for people with life-limiting illnesses? J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023;66(3):e437-e441.
    2. Collins A, Hui D, Davison SN, Ducharlet K, Murtagh F, Chang YK, et al. Referral criteria to specialist palliative care for people with advanced chronic kidney disease: A systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023;66(5):541-550.e541.
    3. Schaefer I, DiGiacomo M, Heneka N, Panozzo S, Luckett T, Phillips JL. Palliative care needs and experiences of people in prison: A systematic review and meta-synthesis. Palliat Med. 2022;36(3):443-461.
    4. Cheng Q, Xu B, Ng MSN, Zheng H, So WKW. Needs assessment instruments for family caregivers of cancer patients receiving palliative care: A systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2022;30(10):8441-8453.
    5. Burke C, Doody O, Lloyd B. Healthcare practitioners’ perspectives of providing palliative care to patients from culturally diverse backgrounds: A qualitative systematic review. BMC Palliat Care. 2023;22(1):1-182.
    6. van Lummel EV, Ietswaard L, Zuithoff NP, Tjan DH, van Delden JJ. The utility of the surprise question: A useful tool for identifying patients nearing the last phase of life? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Palliat Med. 2022;36(7):1023-1046.
    7. Hall A, Boulton E, Kunonga P, Spiers G, Beyer F, Bower P, et al. Identifying older adults with frailty approaching end-of-life: A systematic review. Palliat Med. 2021;35(10):1832-1843.
    8. Christensen DW, Heerfordt AS, Schiødt FV, Simonsen MK. Palliative care to improve life with alcohol related liver cirrhosis: A systematic review. Gastrointest Nurs. 2023;21(Sup6):S16-S24.
    9. Ng S, Ozdemir S. The associations between prognostic awareness and health-related quality of life among patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review. Palliat Med. 2023;37(6):808-823.
    10. Treleaven L, Komesaroff P, La Brooy C, Olver I, Kerridge I, Philip J. A review of the utility of prognostic tools in predicting 6-month mortality in cancer patients, conducted in the context of voluntary assisted dying. Intern Med J. 2023;53(12):2180-2197.
    11. Yoong SQ, Porock D, Whitty D, Tam WWS, Zhang H. Performance of the palliative prognostic index for cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Palliat Med. 2023;37(8):1144-1167.
    12. Byrne A, Torrens-Burton A, Sivell S, Moraes FY, Bulbeck H, Bernstein M, et al. Early palliative interventions for improving outcomes in people with a primary malignant brain tumour and their carers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022;1(1):CD013440.
    13. Rooney EJ, Johnson A, Jeong SYS, Wilson RL. Use of traditional therapies in palliative care for australian first nations peoples: An integrative review. J Clin Nurs. 2022;31(11-12):1465-1476.
    14. Wang SJ, Hu WY, Chang YC. Question prompt list intervention for patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2024;32(4):231.
    15. Young J, Lyons A, Egan R, Dew K. Embodied decisions unfolding over time: A meta-ethnography systematic review of people with cancer's reasons for delaying or declining end-of-life care. BMC Palliat Care. 2024;23(1):45.
    16. Hickman E, Almaqhawi A, Gillies C, Khunti K, Seidu S. Beliefs, practices, perceptions and motivations of healthcare professionals on medication deprescribing during end-of-life care: A systematic review. Prim Care Diabetes. 2024;18(3):249-256.
    17. Shrestha S, Poudel A, Forough AS, Steadman KJ, Nissen LM. A systematic review on methods for developing and validating deprescribing tools for older adults with limited life expectancy. Int J Pharm Pract. 2023;31(1):3-14.
    18. Valleggi A, Passino C, Emdin M, Murante AM. Differences in family caregiver experiences and expectations of end-of-life heart failure care across providers and settings: A systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23(1):429.
    19. Bowers B, Antunes BCP, Etkind S, Hopkins SA, Winterburn I, Kuhn I, et al. Anticipatory prescribing in community end-of-life care: Systematic review and narrative synthesis of the evidence since 2017. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024;13(e3):e612-e623.
    20. Nahm SH, Subramaniam S, Stockler MR, Kiely BE. Timing of prognostic discussions in people with advanced cancer: A systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2024;32(2):127.
    21. Kang JA, Tark A, Estrada LV, Dhingra L, Stone PW. Timing of goals of care discussions in nursing homes: A systematic review. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023;24(12):1820-1830.
    22. Patra L, Ghoshal A, Damani A, Salins N. Cancer palliative care referral: Patients' and family caregivers' perspectives - A systematic review. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022. spcare-2022-003990.
    23. Shlobin NA, Sheldon M, Bernstein M. Ethics of transitioning from curative care to palliative care: Potential conflicts of interest using the example of neurosurgery. World Neurosurg. 2022;168:139-145.
    24. Waller A, Hobden B, Fakes K, Clark K. A systematic review of the development and implementation of needs-based palliative care tools in heart failure and chronic respiratory disease. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:878428.
    25. Jones T, Luth EA, Lin S-Y, Brody AA. Advance care planning, palliative care, and end-of-life care interventions for racial and ethnic underrepresented groups: A systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021;62(3):e248-e260.
    26. Suntai Z, Noh H, Jeong H. Racial and ethnic differences in retrospective end-of-life outcomes: A systematic review. Death Stud. 2023;47(9):1006-1024.
    27. Schuster-Wallace CJ, Nouvet E, Rigby I, Krishnaraj G, de Laat S, Schwartz L, et al. Culturally sensitive palliative care in humanitarian action: Lessons from a critical interpretive synthesis of culture in palliative care literature. Palliat Support Care. 2022;20(4):582-592.
    28. Marshall C, Virdun C, Phillips JL. Evidence-based models of rural palliative care: A systematic review. Palliat Med. 2023;37(8):1129-1143.
    29. Sánchez-Cárdenas MA, Iriarte-Aristizábal MF, León-Delgado MX, Rodríguez-Campos LF, Correa-Morales JE, Cañón-Piñeros A, et al. Rural palliative care telemedicine for advanced cancer patients: A systematic review. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2023;40(8):936-944.
    30. Petreca VG. Death and dying in prison: An integrative review of the literature. J Forensic Nurs. 2021;17(2):115-125.
    31. Chambers S, Spooner A, Parker C, Jack L, Schnitker L, Beattie E, et al. Clinical indicators of acute deterioration in persons who reside in residential aged care facilities: A rapid review. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2023;55(1):365-377.
    32. McCarthy B, Timmins F, Eustace-Cook J, Connolly M. Informal caregivers' experiences of transitioning during end-of-life care - A scoping review. J Adv Nurs. 2024;80(5):1719-1731.

    Last updated 05 December 2024